🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare it to what average US resident spends. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like many federal military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.